4 Reasons Why the Iran Deal May Be the Worst Diplomatic Decision in History

Rarely has there been a deal like the one reached in Vienna...a deal in which all the nations most closely affected by it, including Iran, pretty much start out knowing it won’t end well.

Ed. Note: Obama’s Iran deal makes the world a much more dangerous place. It does not stop Iran’s path to a nuclear bomb. It moves the region closer to a nuclear arms race and possibly nuclear war.

This is a deal by a President who cares more about his political legacy than about the safety of the U.S. and world peace. It was negotiated based on an ideology that believes in diminishing American international influence.

The deal fails the fundamental security goals of the U.S. and puts Iran on a path to nuclear power status with economic funding to get there. It is dangerous, grossly misguided, and must be stopped.


Republished from MyHeritage.org, by Katie Nielsen, July 17, 2015.


The deal the Obama administration reached with Iran is one of the worst in history, according to Heritage Foundation defense expert Jim Carafano:

Rarely has there been a deal like the one reached in Vienna…a deal in which all the nations most closely affected by it, including Iran, pretty much start out knowing it won’t end well.

Not only does the deal undermine nuclear proliferation by legitimizing Iran as a nuclear threshold state, it also undermines our allies.

Here are the four most dangerous problems with the deal:

  1. The whole neighborhood will race to go nuclear. This deal most likely will accelerate nuclear proliferation. Because if regional powers feel threatened by the possibility of Iran getting a weapon and the penalty for producing nuclear weapons decreases, then why wouldn’t they?
  2. Tehran gets to keep its vast nuclear infrastructure and its missile program.  And the promises from Iran only confirm the obvious: that the regime definitely has nuclear-weapons ambitions. After all, why have a massive ballistic-missile program and secret military nuclear facilities if the plan isn’t to build nuclear weapons?
  3. Sanctions relief will make the region far less safe. The sanctions relief and the renewed ability to sell more oil on the open market could wind up bringing $300-400 billion into the Iranian economy, bolstering the Iranian government. Essentially, this means the deal will pay for undermining U.S. policy and interests throughout the region.
  4. The deal is temporary, by design. Even the White House doesn’t claim it will permanently keep Iran from getting a bomb. So, what’s the point?

The deal enriches and emboldens Iran — an unstable and unprincipled nation. And it destabilizes the region even further and its puts its neighbors — our allies — at risk. It is a bad deal.  While the Obama administration insists that there were only two choices — the deal or war — the choices were neither that limited, nor that simple.  As Carafano concludes, “This deal is not the antidote to war. Rather, it makes increased conflict all the more likely.”


Republished from My Heritage.  CLICK HERE to read the original.


 

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Please honor attribution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.