Obama Requests More Money for Former Presidents (himself included)

This would add approximately $588,000 to FY2016’s “former presidents budget” of $3,277,000.

Obama Requests More Money for Former Presidents (himself included)

Ed. Note: Tax-and-spend policies of Democrats have little concern for the overtaxed middle class, the poor, and minorities whose income and household values continue to decline. But Democrats’ support remains strong for their rich cronies at the expense of ordinary taxpayers.
The Democrats love wealth distribution as long as it benefits the powerful and the politically connected. Case in point – this imperial President seeks to scam taxpayers for an 18% increase in retirement funding for himself and other Presidents when he leaves office while his fiscal policies continue to squeeze retirement savings of ordinary folks.

Republished from Independent Journal, by Frank Camp,  March 20, 2016. Image credit: AP

As He’s About to Leave Office, President Obama Requests More Money for Former Presidents

As he heads toward presidential retirement, Barack Obama is asking for a 17.9% increase in “appropriations for expenditures for former Presidents” in his Fiscal Year 2017 budget. This would add approximately $588,000 to FY2016’s “former presidents budget” of $3,277,000, according to the Congressional Research Service.

This is all under the auspices of “The Former Presidents Act,” which was put in place in 1958 in order to provide former presidents with a sort of pension.

All living former presidents make use of this fund. Since the year 2000, Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush have received $9.2 million and $13.4 million respectively. Since 2001, Bill Clinton has received $17.1 million, and since 2009, George W. Bush has received $8.3 million.

Since 2009 alone, the biggest spender has been George W. Bush with an average yearly expenditure of $1.18 million. A close second is Bill Clinton with $1.07 million. George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter are a distant third and fourth.

prez retirment graph-1024x654Image Credit: Congressional Research Service

The Former Presidents Act has come under increasing scrutiny over the last several years, as former presidents tend to make exorbitant amounts of money from speaking fees and book sales.

Politico reports that Bill Clinton has made approximately $127 million in speaking fees alone since leaving office in 2001.

According to The Salt Lake Tribune:

“Bill Clinton’s memoir, ‘My Life,’ netted him a $15 million advance. George W. Bush took in $7 million for the ‘Decision Points.’ Jimmy Carter has 14 books, and President Barack Obama is now a millionaire after the sales of his books and growth in investments.”

In January, the House of Representatives approved Rep. Jason Chaffetz’s (R-UT) bill to slash the funds provided to former presidents. Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) offered a mirror bill in the Senate.

ABC News notes:

“[The bill] would limit yearly presidential pensions to $200,000–slightly less than they’re allowed now–but would cut that amount by a dollar for every dollar they earned over $400,000 a year in the private sector.”

This would effectively erase the pensions of former presidents Clinton and Bush going forward, considering the millions they’ve made on the speaking circuit and with book sales.

Chaffetz suggests that independently wealthy former presidents shouldn’t be receiving taxpayer money:

“The bill updates an arcane law and reduces unnecessary costs to taxpayers. It ends a needless government handout to former presidents making millions of dollars upon leaving office.”

Rep. Chaffetz’s bill has yet to move to the Senate for consideration, and according to GovTrack, it has only about a 17% chance of being enacted.


Republished from Independent Journal online. CLICK HERE to read the original.

This content is published under the Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license. Please honor attribution.

One Response to "Obama Requests More Money for Former Presidents (himself included)"

  1. Wardie Turner  March 30, 2016 at 8:46 pm

    This is absolutely appalling! They are entitled to earn all they can earn, but why should the American people have to pay these amounts when they obviously have enough money independent of this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.